Working from home with school-age kids

Most of the working day is not the problem. Between about nine and three the house is empty and the work gets done, frequently better than in an office because nobody interrupts.

The problem is a two-hour window, roughly from school pick-up to the end of the working day, and secondarily the twelve or so weeks a year when school is not on at all.

Treating the whole arrangement as difficult is what makes it feel unmanageable. Solving one window is achievable.

Structuring the 3.30 block

Move your hardest work out of it. Deep work, anything requiring sustained concentration, and anything with a genuine consequence if interrupted belongs between nine and two thirty. Protect that window in your calendar rather than letting meetings fill it.

Put the low-concentration work in the afternoon. Email, admin, filing, reviewing, scheduling. Work that survives interruption.

Schedule meetings before three wherever you can. For the ones that cannot move, the points below matter.

Have a landing routine for the children. Food, unpacking the bag, and a defined activity. The first twenty minutes after school determines the next two hours, and a child who arrives to nothing will find you. The school-year calendar setup that stops missed notices covers the bag-unpacking half, which conveniently happens at the same moment.

Use the afternoon snack deliberately. Hungry children are the main source of interruption between three and four, and a substantial snack ready on the bench buys a genuine amount of time.

Give them something with a beginning and an end. Homework, a task, an activity, an agreed screen block. Open-ended time produces interruptions; a defined task does not.

The meeting problem

Agree a signal. A closed door, a sign, a light, a specific hat. Something visible that means do not interrupt unless someone is bleeding. Agree it when everyone is calm rather than mid-call.

Teach what counts as an emergency, explicitly, with examples in both directions. Children genuinely do not know, and a child who has been told “only for emergencies” will interrupt for a lost sock because nobody defined it.

Mute by default.

Tell people. A brief acknowledgement that your children are home is far less disruptive than pretending otherwise and being caught. Most colleagues do not care.

Have a fallback. A recorded meeting, a colleague taking notes, or an agreement that you can drop off and catch up.

What to agree with your employer

This is the part people avoid and it is the part that makes the arrangement sustainable.

Be specific about hours rather than vague about flexibility. “I am contactable nine to five and heads-down nine to two thirty” is a clear arrangement. “I am flexible” invites meetings at four.

Put it in writing, even informally in an email, so there is a shared understanding rather than an assumption.

Ask what exists. Compressed weeks, adjusted start and finish times, purchased leave and formal flexible arrangements are available in many Australian workplaces and are frequently not advertised.

The Fair Work Ombudsman is the reference for leave entitlements and for the right to request flexible working arrangements, which applies to parents of school-aged children among others. Requirements, eligibility and the process are matters for Fair Work and your employer, and this article states no legal position on them. Asking for flexible work: what to say and put in writing covers the conversation.

What working from home is not

It is not child care, and treating it as such fails at both jobs.

A child home sick is a day of care, not a day of work. Take the leave or agree an arrangement. Attempting both produces a bad day of work and a child watching screens for eight hours.

A pupil-free day is not a work from home day. This is the single most common misuse of the arrangement and it is why pupil-free days deserve their own planning, as in setting up the family year in January.

School holidays are not covered by it either. Twelve weeks of holidays against four weeks of leave is a structural gap and working from home does not close it. Working parents and the holiday care gap covers the six mechanisms that actually do.

Being honest about these three protects the arrangement. Employers withdraw flexibility when it visibly becomes a substitute for care.

The physical setup

A defined work spot, even a small one. Not the kitchen table if there is any alternative, because a workspace that must be packed away every evening is a workspace that erodes.

Somewhere you can close or leave. The ability to physically end the day matters more in a house than in an office.

Sort the charging and cables, because a household with devices everywhere generates a constant low-level search, as in family device charging and cable chaos.

Check what your employer provides or contributes, and note that claiming home office expenses at tax time has specific ATO rules about what is deductible and what records are required. The ATO is the authority and the rules change, so check the current position rather than assuming.

The part nobody says

Working from home with children in the house is harder than working in an office and easier than commuting. It is a trade, not a solution.

The afternoon will be interrupted. Planning for interruption rather than being surprised by it is the difference between a workable arrangement and a constantly frustrating one.

Some days will not work. A sick child, a school event, a crisis. A household that has built in no slack has no capacity to absorb them.

Next: working parents and the holiday care gap covers the twelve-week problem, family device charging and cable chaos covers the household side, and the school-year calendar setup covers the 3.30 routine.

---